![]() ![]() Using our unique Binary Templates technology, 010 Editor allows a binary file to be parsed into a data structure that can be understood. ![]() So far I haven’t been able to reproduce this in V14.0 on MacOS.010 Editor is a professional hex editor designed to edit any binary file, drive, or process on your machine. I also tried a positive look-behind thus, but I think it crashed at about this point: I continued to experiment, but used a positive look-ahead, thus: ![]() That failed, so I assumed that the assertion might need to be placed after the string to match, thus: My first attempted regular expression, using a look-behind assertion is similar to: ![]() I may be placing the look-behind on the wrong end of the pattern, but I seem to get the same crash after trying it both ways a few times. Then I begin to enter a regular expression in the “Find:” text field, that has a negative look-behind or negative look-ahead assertion modifying the pattern to be matched. Suppose my file contains this (just plain ANSI text): I’m getting ready to do a search using a regular expression, so I’ve checked the search options box for that. Overall, I think something is broken in your Regular Expression parser in 14.0 that wasn’t broken in 13.x, because it’s when I’m entering the regular expression in the Find text field, that 010 Editor crashes. Later, I’ll try to reproduce it at home where I can more easily show you how. After several tries you may well get the crash. So if the below doesn’t work for you, try varying your regular expression’s look-ahead and look-behind assertions. I may not have here the actual order in which I did the searches. I’ll describe it for you so you can try to reproduce it anyway. Although this problem appears to be reproducible, I came across at work where I can’t easily show you how reproduce it. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |